Bullying May Be Worse For Mental Health Than Child Abuse

Children who are bullied by their peers may be more likely to suffer mental health problems later in life than kids who are abused by adults, a study suggests.

Previous research has linked physical, emotional and sexual abuse during childhood to psychological difficulties later in life. Bullying too can have severe, long-lasting psychological and physical effects.

For the new study, researchers looked for associations between maltreatment, being bullied, and long-term mental health problems.

In particular, they say, they wanted to know whether mental health problems in kids exposed to those kinds of experiences are due to both maltreatment and bullying or whether bullying has a unique effect.

“We found, somewhat surprisingly, that those who were bullied and maltreated were not at higher risk than those just bullied,” senior study author Dieter Wolke, a psychology professor at the University of Warwick in the UK, said by email.

The data came from two large studies that tracked mental health in children and then followed them at least until at least age 18. One study, from the US, included more than 1,200 participants. The other, from the UK, involved more than 4,000.

Both studies relied on a combination of interviews with parents to track abuse in younger children as well as reports of bullying by older children.

As young adults, 19 per cent in the UK group and 18 per cent in the US group had mental health issues such as depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts.

After adjusting for other family factors that might contribute to psychological problems, the researchers found an increased risk of depression among abused children in the US group but not in the UK group.

In both groups, however, mental health problems were significantly more likely in children who were bullied by their peers than in kids who were abused.

It’s possible that abuse was underreported by parents questioned about treatment of their children, the researchers note in the study, published in The Lancet Psychiatry and presented today at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting in San Diego.

The study also didn’t explore the severity of abuse or the age at which it began.

Even so, the findings highlight the need for parents, educators and clinicians to pay closer attention to bullying, Wolke said.

“It is particularly novel that they found bullying is a greater source of mental health problems than maltreatment,” said Catherine Bradshaw, deputy director of the Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence in Baltimore.

Given this emerging connection, parents whose children encounter behaviour problems at school should be sure to follow-up to make sure bullying isn’t a factor, said Bradshaw, who wasn’t involved in the study.

At the same time, schools officials who discover bullying should explore whether there might be problems at home.

Teaching good communication and conflict resolution skills before kids reach school age is also important for prevention, she said. Later on, schools should reenforce these skills by creating a strong sense of community and fostering an environment where students feel connected to one another as well as to teachers and other adults.

“Schools often become the outlets where bullying comes to a head,” Bradshaw said. “Creating a sense of belonging has been consistently shown to be a protective factor as have programs that improve the school climate.”

School Bully Programs Not Working

There has to be a reason why these programs have been ineffective.

We believe Our Followers deserve a voice in this debate, so we have a short survey and would appreciate you taking a few minutes to weigh-in on this controversial subject.

http://blackhorn33.polldaddy.com/s/how-would-you-stop-bullying

Senate Passes Trafficking Bill

.jpg photo of Loretta Lynch
Senate passes trafficking bill 99 – 0

The unanimous 99-0 vote belied much of the drama behind the legislation.

The Senate passed a bill aimed at combating human trafficking on Wednesday afternoon, putting to rest six weeks of gridlock over abortion politics and clearing the way for Loretta Lynch to be confirmed as the next attorney general.

The unanimous 99-0 vote belied much of the drama behind the legislation, which jammed up the Senate floor amid partisan bickering over whether the bill’s restitution fund for victims should be subject to abortion restrictions. The row over social issues also obscured strong support for the measure’s core provisions aimed at combating sex slavery.

“Help is finally on the way for the thousands of enslaved victims who suffer unspeakable abuse in the shadows,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Wednesday. “We’re relieved we can finally say it will pass today.”

When the bill hit the Senate floor, Democrats raised objections after failing to notice the abortion restrictions in committee. Things got heated when McConnell tied passage of the bill to Loretta Lynch’s confirmation vote and Democrats lambasted Republicans for holding up the president’s pick to head the Justice Department.

But after several rounds of breakneck negotiations over the past week, both parties agreed to move past the embarrassing episode by compromising on a rewrite of the abortion language.

The legislation offers new resources to human trafficking victims, increases fines on the promoters of sex slavery, creates block grants for juvenile trafficking victims and gives law enforcement new tools to combat the trafficking trade. Those components have consistently drawn support from all 100 senators; it was only the bill’s abortion restrictions that produced a tense, partisan floor fight.

In the initial version of the bill, money for victims came from fines, not the government’s general fund. But the fine money was subject to Hyde amendment prohibitions on spending federal dollars on abortions, which Democrats worried was an expansion of Hyde’s reach.

The solution reached by party leaders was to funnel money into the restitution account from two streams: Fines on traffickers for legal services and from the general fund for health care, where it’s already subject to the Hyde abortion restrictions.

Senators admitted that the bill hadn’t changed much from its initial, non-controversial form, and most lawmakers were eager to move on.

“This is called democracy. It’s all about the end result. We couldn’t get it passed and now we’re going to pass it,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

The compromise and the descriptions of the legislation by party leaders elicited contrasting responses from abortion activists, with Planned Parenthood praising Democratic leaders’ for holding the line on the Hyde amendment and NARAL Pro-Choice America panning the compromise because it “still denies the most vulnerable women necessary access to vital health services.” The anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List backed the compromise.

Party leaders also drew contrasting lessons from the debacle. Democrats said they’ve proven to McConnell that when they stick together the GOP will get nothing, while McConnell said his unusual tactic of linking Lynch’s nomination to the trafficking bill was ultimately successful and he had no regrets.

But members of the rank and file said the idea of sorting winners and losers from the ugly conflict was impossible. The biggest lesson learned might be that social issues like abortion can still cripple the Senate — and cause a high-profile nomination to languish weeks longer than it otherwise would have.

“People had strong principled feelings about it. No one was sitting around going: ‘We’ve got a strategy to make them look bad,’” said Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.). “We just stood our ground. And unfortunately Loretta Lynch’s nomination was a victim of that process, which it never should have been.”